In the consultation of cosmetic surgery, I often saw the performance of such a scene: the patient reached out, picked up his arms, rolled up his trouser legs, and vowed to declare himself a scar. That kind of performance is that the wooden chicken will also be moved, unconsciously into the quagmire of blind faith. So, when you eagerly searched for the parts they showed, but the last thing that was found was always the invisible scars caused by some accidental factors.

Strictly speaking, "scarring physique" is not a medical term. No one has defined it in related professional books, let alone a scientific explanation. In the term “scarring physique”, the most important thing is the term “physique”. "Physique" is also the physical quality, that is, the tendency. Just as some people are prone to high blood pressure, some people are prone to stomach ulcers. The so-called "scarring constitution" refers to the tendency to easily scar. But what kind of physique is considered a scar physique?

What is the population that belongs to the scar?

The repair of the wound is a natural process. The most ideal wound repair is that the wound site after the repair is integrated with the surrounding without leaving any traces. Repairing the red brick and green tile house, using the same red brick and green tile, there is no problem in repairing the old. However, the repair of human wounds is rarely able to use the same material to achieve such an ideal repair effect. Under existing medical conditions, scar formation is still an inevitable process of healing of human incisions. In this sense, people without special scars are “scarred”.

However, the formation of scars is indeed very different, and there are reasons for these differences. For example, due to differences in races, Caucasians are relishing cosmetic surgery, and the yellow races are discouraged by fear of forming obvious scars. Due to the influence of age, it is also a knife injury. The elderly incision will be safe after healing, and the scars of young people will spring up. However, the difference in race or population cannot be used as a criterion for personal physique determination. Individual physique should be considered in the same population of the same race, so that it is comparable. In addition, many factors such as wound size, cleanliness, suturing technique, and suture material are closely related to the formation of scars. These factors are not physical problems, and they cannot be said to be physical.

Based on this reasoning, the term "scarring physique" seems to be blocked. However, the author does not dare to commit the mistake of burning books and confessing Confucianism. Some patients, especially keloid patients, can trace the family history and find out the roots of heredity. In this case, as a concise explanation, "scarring physique" is a good concept.

In an age of advocating beauty, scars and beauty, like cancer and life, are a big problem that cannot be ignored, and must not be open to the public. Many patients, long benign masses, and some people rely on cancer, causing patients to be incompetent. People are inevitably injured, and there will be some scars, but it is only a proof of experience, not a sign of identity. Taking the things of others once does not mean the nature of theft. Scars are not scars, and the two cannot be compared. To determine the scar constitution, the attitude should be scientific and cautious.